Martin. Goal 2: Zero Hunger. United Nations Sustainable Development https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/hunger/.
Accessed 31 Aug 2021.
Zhang, J. et al. Harnessing the plant microbiome to promote the growth of agricultural crops. Microbiol. Res. 245, 126690 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fasusi, O. A., Cruz, C. & Babalola, O. O. Agricultural sustainability: Microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture 11, (2021).
Arif, I., Batool, M. & Schenk, P. M. Plant microbiome engineering: Expected benefits for improved crop growth and resilience. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 1385–1396 (2020).
Google Scholar
Timmusk, S., Behers, L., Muthoni, J., Muraya, A. & Aronsson, A.-C. Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 8, 49–49 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T., Ismail, S. & Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability—A review. Molecules 21, 573 (2016).
Google Scholar
Backer, R. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1473 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bakker, P. A. H. M., Berendsen, R. L., Doornbos, R. F., Wintermans, P. C. A. & Pieterse, C. M. J. The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 165–165 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lugtenberg, B. J. J., Malfanova, N., Kamilova, F. & Berg, G. Microbial control of plant root diseases. in Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere 575–586 (Wiley, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118297674.ch54.
Vacheron, J. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 356 (2013).
Google Scholar
Köhl, L., Oehl, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Agricultural practices indirectly influence plant productivity and ecosystem services through effects on soil biota. Ecol. Appl. 24, 1842–1853 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gupta, G., Parihar, S. S., Ahirwar, N. K., Snehi, S. K. & Singh, V. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 7, 096–102 (2015).
Google Scholar
Finkel, O. M., Castrillo, G., Herrera Paredes, S., Salas González, I. & Dangl, J. L. Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 38, 155–163 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ilangumaran, G. & Smith, D. L. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in amelioration of salinity stress: A systems biology perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1768 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Patel, J. S., Meena, V. S. & Srivastava, R. Recent advances of PGPR based approaches for stress tolerance in plants for sustainable agriculture. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 20, 101271 (2019).
Qessaoui, R. et al. Applications of new rhizobacteria pseudomonas isolates in agroecology via fundamental processes complementing plant growth. Sci. Rep. 9, 12832 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shaikh, S., Yadav, N. & Markande, A. R. Interactive potential of Pseudomonas species with plants. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 8, 101–111 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sitaraman, R. Pseudomonas spp. as models for plant-microbe interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 787–787 (2015).
Google Scholar
Baltrus, D. A. et al. Dynamic evolution of pathogenicity revealed by sequencing and comparative genomics of 19 pseudomonas syringae isolates. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002132 (2011).
Google Scholar
Liu, B., Zheng, D., Jin, Q., Chen, L. & Yang, J. VFDB 2019: A comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D687–D692 (2019).
Google Scholar
Loper, J. E. et al. Comparative genomics of plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: Insights into diversity and inheritance of traits involved in multitrophic interactions. PLOS Genet. 8, e1002784 (2012).
Google Scholar
Passera, A. et al. Not just a pathogen? Description of a plant-beneficial pseudomonas syringae strain. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1409–1409 (2019).
Google Scholar
Richardson, L. J. et al. Genome properties in 2019: A new companion database to InterPro for the inference of complete functional attributes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D564–D572 (2018).
Google Scholar
Koehorst, J. J. et al. Comparison of 432 Pseudomonas strains through integration of genomic, functional, metabolic and expression data. Sci. Rep. 6, 38699 (2016).
Google Scholar
te Molder, D., Poncheewin, W., Schaap, P. J. & Koehorst, J. J. Machine learning approaches to predict the Plant-associated phenotype of Xanthomonas strains. BMC Genom. 22, 848 (2021).
Melnyk, R. A., Hossain, S. S. & Haney, C. H. Convergent gain and loss of genomic islands drive lifestyle changes in plant-associated Pseudomonas. ISME J. 13, 1575–1588 (2019).
Google Scholar
Winsor, G. L. et al. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D646–D653 (2016).
Google Scholar
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Google Scholar
Visnovsky, S. B. et al. Using multilocus sequence analysis to distinguish pathogenic from saprotrophic strains of Pseudomonas from stone fruit and kiwifruit. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 155, 643–658 (2019).
Google Scholar
Allen, J. P., Snitkin, E., Pincus, N. B. & Hauser, A. R. Forest and trees: Exploring bacterial virulence with genome-wide association studies and machine learning. Trends Microbiol. 29, 621–633 (2021).
Google Scholar
Monteil, C. L. et al. Soil water flow is a source of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in subalpine headwaters. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2038–2052 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hassan, J. A., de la Torre-Roche, R., White, J. C. & Lewis, J. D. Soil mixture composition alters Arabidopsis susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae infection. Plant Direct 2, e00044–e00044 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bergman, N. H., Passalacqua, K. D., Hanna, P. C. & Qin, Z. S. Operon prediction for sequenced bacterial genomes without experimental information. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 846 (2007).
Google Scholar
Ramkumar, G., Lee, S. W., Weon, H.-Y., Kim, B.-Y. & Lee, Y. H. First report on the whole genome sequence of Pseudomonas cichorii strain JBC1 and comparison with other Pseudomonas species. Plant. Pathol. 64, 63–70 (2015).
Google Scholar
Villarreal-Chiu, J. F., Quinn, J. P. & McGrath, J. W. The genes and enzymes of phosphonate metabolism by bacteria, and their distribution in the marine environment. Front. Microbiol. 3, 19–19 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yu, X. et al. Diversity and abundance of phosphonate biosynthetic genes in nature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20759–20764 (2013).
Google Scholar
White, A. K. & Metcalf, W. W. Microbial metabolism of reduced phosphorus compounds. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61, 379–400 (2007).
Google Scholar
Shiraishi, T. & Kuzuyama, T. Biosynthetic pathways and enzymes involved in the production of phosphonic acid natural products. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 85, 42–52 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lamarche, M. G., Wanner, B. L., Crépin, S. & Harel, J. The phosphate regulon and bacterial virulence: A regulatory network connecting phosphate homeostasis and pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32, 461–473 (2008).
Google Scholar
Ernst, D. C., Anderson, M. E. & Downs, D. M. l-2,3-Diaminopropionate generates diverse metabolic stresses in Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 101, 210–223 (2016).
Google Scholar
Trapet, P. et al. The Pseudomonas fluorescens siderophore pyoverdine weakens Arabidopsis thaliana defense in favor of growth in iron-deficient conditions. Plant Physiol. 171, 675–693 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bultreys, A. & Gheysen, I. Siderophore uses in Pseudomonas syringae identification. In Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars and Related Pathogens—Identification, Epidemiology and Genomics (eds Fatmi, M. et al.) 21–35 (Springer Netherlands, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6901-7_2.
Google Scholar
Kobylarz, M. J. et al. Synthesis of L-2, 3-diaminopropionic acid, a siderophore and antibiotic precursor. Chem. Biol. 21, 379–388 (2014).
Google Scholar
Aznar, A. & Dellagi, A. New insights into the role of siderophores as triggers of plant immunity: What can we learn from animals?. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 3001–3010 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Preston, J. F. 3rd. & Romeo, T. The pgaABCD locus of Escherichia coli promotes the synthesis of a polysaccharide adhesin required for biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 186, 2724–2734 (2004).
Google Scholar
Adachi, O. et al. Characterization of quinohemoprotein amine dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas putida. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 62, 469–478 (1998).
Google Scholar
Büttner, D. Protein export according to schedule: Architecture, assembly, and regulation of type III secretion systems from plant- and animal-pathogenic bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 262 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lombardi, C. et al. Structural and functional characterization of the type three secretion system (T3SS) needle of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 10, 573 (2019).
Google Scholar
Trantas, E. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of multiple strains of two unusual plant pathogens: Pseudomonas corrugata and Pseudomonas mediterranea. Front. Microbiol. 6, (2015).
Diallo, M. D. et al. Pseudomonas syringae naturally lacking the canonical type III secretion system are ubiquitous in nonagricultural habitats, are phylogenetically diverse and can be pathogenic. ISME J. 6, 1325–1335 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gazi, A. D. et al. Phylogenetic analysis of a gene cluster encoding an additional, rhizobial-like type III secretion system that is narrowly distributed among Pseudomonas syringae strains. BMC Microbiol. 12, 188 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wawrik, B., Kerkhof, L., Kukor, J. & Zylstra, G. Effect of different carbon sources on community composition of bacterial enrichments from soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 6776–6783 (2005).
Google Scholar
Thakur, M. & Sohal, B. S. Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: A review. ISRN Biochem. 2013, 762412–762412 (2013).
Google Scholar
Regnault, T. et al. The gibberellin precursor GA12 acts as a long-distance growth signal in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 1, 15073 (2015).
Google Scholar
Morrone, D. et al. Gibberellin biosynthesis in bacteria: Separate ent-copalyl diphosphate and ent-kaurene synthases in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. FEBS Lett. 583, 475–480 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bharathi, R., Vivekananthan, R., Harish, S., Ramanathan, A. & Samiyappan, R. Rhizobacteria-based bio-formulations for the management of fruit rot infection in chillies. Crop Prot. 23, 835–843 (2004).
Ruinelli, M., Blom, J., Smits, T. H. M. & Pothier, J. F. Comparative genomics and pathogenicity potential of members of the Pseudomonas syringae species complex on Prunus spp. BMC Genom. 20, 172 (2019).
Alfano, J. R. et al. The Pseudomonas syringae Hrp pathogenicity island has a tripartite mosaic structure composed of a cluster of type III secretion genes bounded by exchangeable effector and conserved effector loci that contribute to parasitic fitness and pathogenicity in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4856–4861 (2000).
Google Scholar
Wen-Ling, D., Rehm Amos, H., Charkowski, A. O., Rojas, C. M. & Collmer, A. Pseudomonas syringae exchangeable effector loci: Sequence diversity in representative pathovars and virulence function in P. syringae pv. syringae B728a. J. Bacteriol. 185, 2592–2602 (2003).
Warris, S. et al. pyPaSWAS: Python-based multi-core CPU and GPU sequence alignment. PLoS ONE 13, e0190279 (2018).
Google Scholar
Koren, S. et al. Canu: Scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27, 722–736 (2017).
Google Scholar
Koehorst, J. J. et al. SAPP: Functional genome annotation and analysis through a semantic framework using FAIR principles. Bioinformatics 34, 1401–1403 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 11, 119 (2010).
Haft, D. H. et al. TIGRFAMs: A protein family resource for the functional identification of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 41–43 (2001).
Google Scholar
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).
Google Scholar
El-Gebali, S. et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D427–D432 (2018).
Google Scholar
van Dam, J. C. J., Koehorst, J. J. J., Vik, J. O., Schaap, P. J. & Suarez-Diez, M. Interoperable genome annotation with GBOL, an extendable infrastructure for functional data mining. bioRxiv 184747 (2017).
van Dam, J. C. J. et al. The Empusa code generator and its application to GBOL, an extendable ontology for genome annotation. Sci. Data 6, 254 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lee, I., Kim, Y. O., Park, S.-C. & Chun, J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 1100–1103 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bergstrand, L. H., Neufeld, J. D. & Doxey, A. C. Pygenprop: A Python library for programmatic exploration and comparison of organism Genome Properties. Bioinformatics (2019).
Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002).
Source: www.nature.com